ReviewInsects2026
Research Trends, Hotspots and Future Perspectives of Geometric Morphometrics in Entomology: A Scientometric Review.
Review in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sexual Dimorphism in the Pronotum and Elytra ofInsects · 2026Article
- Arthropod Natural Enemies in Biological Control: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis 2016-2025.Insects · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Geometric morphometrics is an important component of quantitative research on insect morphology, widely applied in taxonomy, intraspecific variation, and phylogenetic studies. However, systematic research in this field remains limited, with few comprehensive summaries of research trends, hotspots, and core theories. This study, based on scientometric methods, analyzed 1321 publications indexed in the Web of Science database up to 31 December 2025, and presents a meta-scientific review from a macro perspective, revealing the research trends, hotspots, and future directions in the field. The results show that: (1) annual publications exhibit overall growth, while research methods evolved from single landmark analysis to multimodal and interdisciplinary approaches; (2) scientists from Brazil, the USA, and France are major contributors, with studies spanning morphology, taxonomy, and ecology; (3) taxonomic studies centered on wing shape analysis constitutes a major research hotspot, closely related to phylogeny, allometry, and sexual dimorphism; (4) highly co-cited studies provide the main theoretical and methodological foundations for the field. Future research, building on existing hotspots, will further integrate geometric morphometrics with genomics, ecological functional data, three-dimensional geometric morphometrics, and artificial intelligence-assisted approaches to advance integrative taxonomy within interdisciplinary and data-driven frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.