ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Hemodynamic Changes During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia in Normotensive and Hypertensive Pregnant Women-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data on cardiac and hemodynamic parameters associated with preeclampsia (PE), particularly changes occurring in the immediate perioperative period, remain scarce. These changes are clinically important for the management of patients with severe PE or underlying cardiac dysfunction. Maternal hemodynamics undergo substantial alterations during cesarean section (CS) as a result of sympathetic blockade induced by spinal anesthesia, the vasodilatory effects of general anesthetics, and changes in blood flow related to aortocaval compression in the supine position and during delivery. Massive hemorrhage represents an additional factor contributing to these alterations. In routine clinical practice, maternal heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) are monitored to assess circulatory status. However, a more precise evaluation can be achieved by measuring stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). These parameters are particularly relevant in cases of severe hemorrhage or hypertension, as they may facilitate targeted hemodynamic management. Overall, hemodynamic responses to cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia appear to differ between normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. Normotensive parturients seem to be more susceptible to pronounced hypotension following sympathetic blockade, whereas hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with altered vascular reactivity and modified intraoperative hemodynamic responses. Nevertheless, interpretation of these findings remains limited by the heterogeneity of the available studies and the lack of quantitative evidence synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.