ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
SGLT2 Inhibitors After Myocardial Infarction: Evidence, Mechanisms and Gaps in Knowledge.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of SGLT2 Inhibitor Use with All-Cause Mortality Following CIED Implantation for Conduction Disease in Patients with Preserved LVEF: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond glycemic control: SGLT2 inhibitors as time-sensitive organ-protective agents in acute injury-mechanistic insights and translational implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have revolutionized the treatment of heart failure and are now established as disease-modifying therapies across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. More recently, these agents have been evaluated in the early post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting, raising interest in their potential role beyond heart failure prevention. Evidence from post-AMI randomized trials and contemporary meta-analyses consistently shows neutral effects on ischemic coronary outcomes, despite favorable effects on heart failure-related endpoints, ventricular remodeling, and cardiometabolic parameters. At the same time, data from experimental and translational research provide a biological framework in which SGLT2i exert anti-atherogenic effects through multiple complementary mechanisms, including improvement of cardiometabolic risk factors, attenuation of vascular and systemic inflammation, modulation of endothelial function, regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell behavior, macrophage inflammatory polarization, inhibition of inflammasome signaling, and modulation of the perivascular adipose tissue-vascular interface. Taken together, the available evidence highlights a dissociation between clinical trial outcomes in the early post-AMI phase and the underlying vascular biology associated with SGLT2 inhibition. While the dominant early clinical effects of SGLT2i appear to relate to hemodynamic and heart failure-preventive mechanisms, their potential impact on atherosclerotic disease may be more gradual and context-dependent. This review summarizes current clinical and mechanistic evidence supporting this interpretation and discusses the implications for understanding the role of SGLT2i in patients after AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.