ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Transcatheter Valve Replacement for Mitral Stenosis: A State of the Art Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative mitral stenosis (MS) secondary to extensive mitral annular calcification (MAC) represents a growing clinical challenge in an aging population. These patients are often elderly, frail, and harbor a significant burden of comorbidities, rendering conventional mitral valve surgery prohibitively high-risk. While transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a potential alternative, the current evidence is only derived from single-arm observational registries. Therefore, the transition toward randomized controlled trials to define optimal patient selection and long-term prosthetic durability is necessary. This review examines the current landscape of TMVR for degenerative MS, focusing on the role of multimodal pre-procedural planning, procedural technique, and prevention of the principal complications. The integration of echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is essential for evaluating anatomical feasibility, particularly in predicting neo left ventricle outflow tract (neo-LVOT) obstruction, the primary determinant of procedural mortality. However, it is limited due to the absence of standardized protocol. We are showing the outcomes of off-label balloon-expandable aortic prostheses and dedicated TMVR system, which are the only two devices which data in patients with MS are available. Despite high technical success rates in specialized centers, complications, including paravalvular leak, valve thrombosis, and device migration, remain more prevalent than in aortic interventions. We present some tips and tricks to prevent and manage adverse events. TMVR represents a transformative frontier for inoperable patients with severe MAC. However, its routine clinical adoption requires further refinement of dedicated technologies and standardized imaging protocols to improve safety and bridge the gap between palliative medical therapy and definitive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.