ReviewCancers2026
From Physiology to Clinical Practice in Pancreatic Cancer-Related Thromboembolism-A Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy linked to the highest rate of thromboembolic complications (TEC) among all solid tumors. TECs occur in approximately 5-40% of PC patients. The most common type of TEC in PC is venous thromboembolism (VTE). The mechanisms leading to frequent TEC in PC are complex and involve interactions between tumor-derived procoagulant factors and the prothrombotic tumor microenvironment (TME). Secretion of tissue factor and proinflammatory cytokines by tumor cells and the TME, overexpression of heparanase and podoplanin, impaired fibrynolysis and increased neutrophil extracellular trap formation lead to platelet hyperactivation resulting in hypercoagulability in PC. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for identifying risk factors of TEC. Current thromboembolism risk models have limited predictive accuracy, which reduces their clinical usefulness. Identifying patients with thromboembolism is challenging because these events are often asymptomatic and their clinical presentation varies depending on the location of the thrombus. Treatment of VTE in PC depends on the phase of the VTE; in the acute phase, treatment primarily involves LMWH. For long-term management, LMWH may be replaced by direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban. In cases of VTE recurrence, increasing the LMWH dose, switching to an oral anticoagulant, or placing an inferior vena cava filter should be considered. LWMH and unfractionated heparin (UFH) are preferred options for VTE prophylaxis. Novel therapies, including factor XI inhibitors, show efficacy comparable to LMWH while offering a better safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.