ReviewCancers2026
The Emerging Melanoma Management: Historical Perspective to Future Directions.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive form of cancer that accounts for approximately 80% of skin cancer-associated mortality. Treatment strategies for melanoma have been rapidly evolving over the past two decades. Clinical outcomes for advanced melanoma patients have improved with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, including combination therapies. In this review, we primarily focus on the evolution of novel therapies for advanced melanoma patients, existing and emerging melanoma biomarkers, and the most up-to-date treatment recommendations. Furthermore, we summarise ongoing studies, clinical trials, and emerging therapeutic strategies. In this review, we will walk you through how cutaneous melanoma treatment strategies have evolved over the past 50 years. We will provide background on how those strategies were developed, how they function, their pros and cons, and their performance in terms of clinical benefits. Lastly, we will provide insights into potential therapies and research areas. In summary, improving the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade remains the most promising approach for improving cutaneous melanoma management. However, strategies such as CAR-T/NK, PROTAC, or extracellular vesicle-based therapies are also worth further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.