Evidence mapPaperPMID 41899809Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bioresorbable Vascular Stents: How Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Influence Biocompatibility, Degradation Kinetics, and Device Performance.

Rasit Dinc, Nurittin Ardic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rasit DincINVAMED Medical Innovation Institute, New York, NY 10007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-0262
Nurittin ArdicMed-International UK Health Agency Ltd., Nuneaton CV11 6LT, Warwickshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2726-7990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS; also referred to as bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, BVS) represent a promising approach in interventional cardiology, offering theoretical advantages such as temporary mechanical support followed by complete resorption. However, clinical experience has revealed challenges, including late-stage scaffold thrombosis and heterogeneous scaffold discontinuity during degradation, prompting investigation into host immune responses. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are network-like structures composed of decondensed chromatin decorated with antimicrobial proteins, have emerged as critical mediators of vascular inflammation and thrombosis. This review explores the intersection between NET biology and BRS performance, investigating how NETosis affects biocompatibility, degradation kinetics, and device-related complications. We discuss the molecular mechanisms that trigger neutrophil activation and NET formation in scaffold materials, the effect of NET components on polymeric and metallic scaffold degradation, and emerging biomarkers to monitor NET-mediated complications. We also evaluate therapeutic strategies targeting NET pathways, including DNase-based therapies, peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) inhibitors, and anti-inflammatory coatings that can optimize next-generation BRS outcomes. Understanding the immunological environment surrounding bioresorbable vascular devices is crucial for developing scaffolds that deliver predictable degradation while minimizing adverse inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybioresorbable scaffoldcardiovascular deviceimmunothrombosisneutrophil extracellular traps

Identifiers

PMID41899809
PMCPMC13023500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.