ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Towards Feasible Home ECG Monitoring: AI-Driven Detection of Clinically Critical Arrhythmias Using Single-Lead Signals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiating life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia, from non-threatening ones is crucial for clinical applications. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to classify five key Electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns: normal sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia. We collected 1500 single-lead 10 s ECG signals from public datasets, including PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology (CiC) Challenge 2020 and the Malignant Ventricular Ectopy Database, for training and 2297 ECGs for testing. Each 10 s signal was decomposed into 1 s sliding windows with a 5-point stride, which served as the input for the proposed deep learning architecture utilizing temporal attention and Time2Vec embedding. The model performance achieved an overall accuracy of 95.2%. For the five classes-supraventricular tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, normal sinus rhythm, ventricular tachycardia, and sinus bradycardia-the model achieved sensitivities of 90.3%, 92.9%, 97.4%, 100.0%, and 99.0% and accuracies of 96.3%, 95.8%, 98.9%, 99.9%, and 99.5%, respectively. Specificities for all rhythm categories exceeded 97.4%. This simple and effective single-lead model can significantly support the growing trend of home healthcare and professional clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.