ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Engineering the Image Representation for Deep Learning in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Analysis of Preprocessing and Anatomical Masking.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically Robust Deep Learning for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Multicenter Evaluation Across Convolutional Neural Network Architectures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep-learning models applied to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are known to be highly sensitive to the input image representation. However, preprocessing is often treated as a secondary step and rarely analyzed as an independent design variable. In this work, we present a systematic engineering analysis of a deterministic, label-independent preprocessing pipeline for CEM images. The pipeline integrates intensity normalization, global histogram matching, local contrast enhancement, denoising, and anatomically constrained breast masking. Using a controlled experimental design, identical deep-learning architectures were trained under different input representations to isolate the impact of preprocessing on classification performance and stability. Across convolutional neural network architectures, anatomically constrained preprocessing consistently improves discrimination performance, reduces variability across cross-validation folds, and enhances training stability. Breast mask-based representations demonstrate substantial gains in AUROC and AUPRC compared to raw DICOM inputs. These findings highlight image preprocessing as a first-class engineering component in medical AI pipelines. Breast masking significantly improves robustness and generalization, independently of network architecture complexity. From a clinical perspective, improving model robustness and sensitivity to malignant lesions may contribute to more reliable AI-assisted decision support in contrast-enhanced mammography, particularly in settings characterized by acquisition variability and heterogeneous patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.