ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2026
Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac biomarkers in athletes and active individuals: a clinical review of exercise-induced elevations and diagnostic interpretation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly influencing the assessment and delivery of movement and exercise, yet its role within adapted physical activity (APA) for individuals with chronic conditions has not been comprehensively synthesized. ML-based approaches have the potential to enhance functional assessment, support individualized exercise prescription, and facilitate scalable monitoring across preventive, community-based, and long-term adapted exercise settings, particularly in populations characterized by functional heterogeneity and variable responses to exercise. The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize and critically discuss current ML applications relevant to the core professional processes of APA practice. A structured narrative review was conducted using searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by targeted searches in engineering-oriented sources to capture ML methods not consistently indexed in biomedical databases. The search covered the period in which contemporary ML approaches have been increasingly applied to human movement and exercise research and was last updated in January 2026. Evidence was synthesized thematically into application-oriented domains relevant to APA practice. ML applications in APA include markerless motion and gait analysis, wearable-sensor data processing, balance and fall-risk assessment, and functional classification. Predictive and adaptive models support individualized regulation of exercise intensity, progression, and workload, including remote and hybrid delivery models. Applications span oncology, cardiometabolic, respiratory, neuromuscular conditions, and adapted sport contexts. Ethical, legal, and governance issues, such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, and professional accountability, emerge as central considerations for safe and equitable implementation. ML represents a promising decision-support layer for APA, complementing professional expertise through enhanced assessment, personalization, and monitoring. Its effective integration requires robust validation, interpretability, and responsible governance to ensure that ML augments, rather than replaces, professional judgment in APA practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.