Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900840›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2026

Applications of Pharmacometrics in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development.

Xiaoliang Cheng, Shuangmin Ji, Yonghyun Lee, Haiyan Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoliang ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Shuangmin JiGSK, Beijing 100025, China.
Yonghyun LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2728-9698
Haiyan DongDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.

Funding

a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project through the Korean Health In-dustry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Re-public of Korea RS-2023-00265981a Korean Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education 2023R1A6C103A026The Basic Science Research Program, through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education 2022M3H4A1A03067401the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81503010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which integrate a cytotoxic drug known as the payload into a tumor-targeting monoclonal antibody via a linker, have emerged as promising candidates for cancer therapy and are a new avenue for targeted cancer therapy. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of ADCs are distinctive due to their unique distribution, catabolism, and elimination. Their deconjugation in circulation and variations in the drug-to-antibody ratio increase the complexity of their PK profiles. Pharmacometric models depicting the PK properties and exposure-response (E-R) relationships of ADCs are important for optimizing dosing regimens and supporting decisions during ADC development. This review considers the PK profiles of ADCs, physiologically based PK models, semi-mechanistic and mechanistic PK models, population PK models, and E-R analyses for dose optimization. The prospects and challenges for ADCs, especially the urgent need for advanced analytical technology and modeling approaches, are also outlined.

Indexed as

antibody-drug conjugatedose optimizationexposure-response (E-R) analysismodelingpharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

Identifiers

PMID41900840
PMCPMC13029055

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.