Evidence mapPaperPMID 41900920Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Overview of Aging, Skin Health, Estrogen, Menopause and HRT.

Edwin D Lephart, Zoe D Draelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edwin D LephartDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and The Neuroscience Center, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Zoe D DraelosDermatology Consulting Services, PLLC, High Point, NC 27262, USA.

Funding

College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University 19-2215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While skin aging is inevitable, healthy habits, sun protection, skincare, and medical interventions can slow visible skin changes; estrogen is also crucial. In 2002, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) results contributed to the subsequent trend toward fear and avoidance of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Since 2002, the WHI results have been re-evaluated and caused the US FDA to announce "the removal of the misleading FDA warnings on HRT", stating that "estrogen is a key hormone for women's health where every single part of a woman's body depends on estrogen to operate at its best-including the brain, bones, heart, and muscles". This overview explores this transformation of scientific information/perspective on HRT via (a) aging and skin health; (b) the importance and changes in estrogen in women with a focus on dermal parameters; (c) provides a brief review of the WHI result, impact, and current status of this report; (d) explores the "timing hypothesis" for HRT interventions; and (e) proposes that HRT might be considered not only for symptomatic women but also for esthetic treatment in perimenopause and menopause patients. The latest reviews support a recent large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis on skin parameters, which suggests that HRT may have a place in esthetic treatment. However, beyond esthetic benefits, the positive implications of HRT on several other health parameters in women during aging are briefly presented. Of course, hormonal and numerous other treatments require a review of the risks/benefits and their discussion among the patient and medical professionals to determine the most effective interventions for treating hormone-related skin changes, but this shift in perspective warrants further investigation and validation.

Indexed as

agingestrogenHTRmenopauseMHTperimenopauseskin

Identifiers

PMID41900920
PMCPMC13028490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.