ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Unmet Need to Verify Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients with Chronic or Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Diseases: From Basic Research to Clinical Application-3rd Edition.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is a common endotype in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Pathophysiologically, the presence of CAS among arteries is not normal, as evidenced by several interacting mechanisms involving CAS development, including the endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells, adventitia, autonomic nervous system, local inflammation, and systemic inflammation. Clinically, CAS is a dynamic process with a threshold effect on presentation; it can present as silent ischemia, atypical chest pain, resting angina, chronic coronary syndrome, acute coronary syndrome, variant angina, and even sudden cardiac arrest. Incomplete intracoronary provocation testing to exclude CAS as the etiology of chronic or acute coronary syndrome leads to an incorrect diagnosis and, subsequently, inappropriate treatment. Identification of the correct endotypes of chronic and acute coronary syndromes is critical for the selection of appropriate therapy, which thus affects disease outcome. Therefore, it is essential to complete intracoronary provocation testing for both the right and left coronary arteries to reach a correct diagnosis regarding CAS, including epicardial vasospasm and microvascular spasm. If CAS is found not to be the cause of myocardial ischemia, then a microvascular functional assessment is the next step to identify the etiology of the ischemic event. A comprehensive assessment of CAS is essential before appropriate treatments can be started.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.