ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Processed Diets and Food Additives Shape the Gut Microbiota and Chronic Disease Risk Across the Life Course-A Three-Layer Ecosystem Disruption Model (TLED) Model.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiome-Hormone Interactions and Precision Fermentation in the Prevention of Early Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Special Issue "Current Research on the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Human Diseases and Health".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) represent a distinct dietary paradigm characterized by structurally simplified food matrices and chronic exposure to multiple additives, including emulsifiers, artificial sweeteners, and preservatives. Rather than acting in isolation, these compounds operate within a multi-additive environment that reshapes the gut ecosystem through convergent mechanisms. Emerging evidence suggests that additive-rich ultra-processed dietary environments may disrupt the gut ecosystem through three interconnected layers: (1) structural impairment of the intestinal barrier, including mucus erosion and tight-junction destabilization; (2) microbial metabolic shifts marked by short-chain fatty acid depletion, altered bile acid signaling, and enrichment of lipopolysaccharide-producing taxa; and (3) immune and inflammatory reprogramming promoting low-grade systemic inflammation. These processes collectively reduce ecosystem resilience-the capacity of the gut microbiota to resist and recover from perturbation. Vulnerability to additive-driven dysbiosis varies across the life course. During infancy, incomplete ecosystem stabilization may increase susceptibility to long-term ecological imprinting, whereas in older age, reduced microbial diversity and immune remodeling may impair recovery capacity following dietary stressors. In contrast, fiber-rich, minimally processed dietary patterns appear to enhance microbial resilience by reinforcing functional redundancy, metabolic buffering, and barrier integrity. Although much mechanistic evidence has been derived from experimental models, accumulating human data support the biological plausibility of additive-associated microbiota alterations. By integrating multi-additive exposure, ecosystem disruption, life-course modulation, and resilience within a unified framework, this review provides a mechanistically coherent model linking ultra-processed dietary environments to microbiota-mediated chronic disease risk. Here, we formalize this integrative perspective as the Three-Layer Ecosystem Disruption (TLED) Model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.