Evidence mapPaperPMID 41901023Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Processed Diets and Food Additives Shape the Gut Microbiota and Chronic Disease Risk Across the Life Course-A Three-Layer Ecosystem Disruption Model (TLED) Model.

Monica Manciulea Profir, Luciana Alexandra Pavelescu, Gabriel Florin Răzvan Mogoş, Alin Constantin Stancu, Sanda Maria Cretoiu, Ileana Marinescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica Manciulea ProfirDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0006-7596-7330
Luciana Alexandra PavelescuDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-6956
Gabriel Florin Răzvan MogoşDepartment of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Alin Constantin StancuDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0000-9950-9939
Sanda Maria CretoiuDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-4880
Ileana MarinescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) represent a distinct dietary paradigm characterized by structurally simplified food matrices and chronic exposure to multiple additives, including emulsifiers, artificial sweeteners, and preservatives. Rather than acting in isolation, these compounds operate within a multi-additive environment that reshapes the gut ecosystem through convergent mechanisms. Emerging evidence suggests that additive-rich ultra-processed dietary environments may disrupt the gut ecosystem through three interconnected layers: (1) structural impairment of the intestinal barrier, including mucus erosion and tight-junction destabilization; (2) microbial metabolic shifts marked by short-chain fatty acid depletion, altered bile acid signaling, and enrichment of lipopolysaccharide-producing taxa; and (3) immune and inflammatory reprogramming promoting low-grade systemic inflammation. These processes collectively reduce ecosystem resilience-the capacity of the gut microbiota to resist and recover from perturbation. Vulnerability to additive-driven dysbiosis varies across the life course. During infancy, incomplete ecosystem stabilization may increase susceptibility to long-term ecological imprinting, whereas in older age, reduced microbial diversity and immune remodeling may impair recovery capacity following dietary stressors. In contrast, fiber-rich, minimally processed dietary patterns appear to enhance microbial resilience by reinforcing functional redundancy, metabolic buffering, and barrier integrity. Although much mechanistic evidence has been derived from experimental models, accumulating human data support the biological plausibility of additive-associated microbiota alterations. By integrating multi-additive exposure, ecosystem disruption, life-course modulation, and resilience within a unified framework, this review provides a mechanistically coherent model linking ultra-processed dietary environments to microbiota-mediated chronic disease risk. Here, we formalize this integrative perspective as the Three-Layer Ecosystem Disruption (TLED) Model.

Indexed as

chronic inflammationdysbiosisecosystem resiliencefood additivesgut microbiotaimmune reprogrammingintestinal barrierlife-coursemicrobiological scarringmulti-additive exposureshort-chain fatty acidsultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID41901023
PMCPMC13027645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.