ReviewNutrients2026
Carnivore and Animal-Based Diets in Sport: A Critical Evaluation of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives for Precision Nutrition.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How diet therapy affects obesity-associated depressive symptoms: from mechanism to therapeutics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing popularity of carnivore and animal-based diets among athletes has generated substantial interest, despite limited direct scientific evidence supporting their efficacy and safety in sport-specific contexts. This narrative review critically evaluates the current evidence and examines the physiological, performance, and health-related implications of these dietary models in athletic populations. These dietary models, characterized by the partial or complete exclusion of plant-derived foods, are often promoted on the basis of mechanistic arguments, anecdotal reports, and extrapolations from research on ketogenic and very low-carbohydrate diets. However, their physiological relevance, long-term health implications, and compatibility with the demands of athletic training remain poorly defined. This narrative review provides a critical perspective on the current evidence related to carnivore and animal-based diets in sport, integrating findings from studies on low-carbohydrate, ketogenic, high-protein, and elimination-based dietary patterns. The analysis focuses on metabolic adaptations, body composition, exercise performance, gastrointestinal function, micronutrient adequacy, hormonal responses, and potential long-term health risks. Particular attention is given to the distinction between metabolic adaptations and functional performance outcomes, as well as to the high interindividual variability in dietary responses. The available evidence suggests that while carbohydrate restriction may induce specific metabolic adaptations, such as increased fat oxidation, these changes do not consistently translate into improved performance, particularly in high-intensity or high-volume training contexts. Moreover, the highly restrictive nature of carnivore and animal-based diets raises concerns about micronutrient deficiencies, alterations in the gut microbiota, changes in the lipid profile, and potential effects on eating behaviours, particularly in competitive athletic populations. Given the absence of well-controlled, long-term intervention studies in athletes, carnivore and animal-based diets cannot currently be recommended as safe or optimal nutritional strategies for sports performance. Rather than representing viable alternatives to established sports nutrition guidelines, these dietary models may be better understood as experimental or short-term tools within highly controlled research or diagnostic frameworks. Future research should prioritize rigorous, sport-specific study designs, long-term safety outcomes, and personalized approaches that account for individual metabolic and physiological variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.