ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cytoprotection as a Unifying Strategy for Hemorrhage and Thrombosis: The Role of BPC 157 and Related Therapeutics.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Adrenalectomy, and the Stable Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Therapy in Rats-A Cytoprotection Approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BPC-157 as an Investigational Peptide Therapeutic: Biopharmaceutical Challenges, Formulation Strategies, and Translational Development Barriers.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review presents an innovative and timely exploration of how cytoprotection can serve as a cohesive therapeutic approach by which to address the hemorrhage-thrombosis paradox. Presenting counteraction of both hemorrhage and thrombosis as phase-dependent outcomes of vascular dysregulation, the manuscript synthesizes conceptual, experimental, and clinical evidence into a unified systems-level model focused on the stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157, which acts as a cytoprotective mediator. In rodents, BPC 157 can simultaneously counteract hemorrhage and thrombosis without directly affecting the coagulation cascade (aggregometry, thromboelastometry). This cytoprotective framework (decreased hemorrhage, decreased thrombosis) stands with presentation of both hemorrhage and thrombosis in the wound, arrhythmias, and Virchow triad, and resolution of these disturbances. As proof of the concept (full cytoprotective effect), a vasoprotective cytoprotective mediator capable of bidirectional regulation, BPC 157, is effective for wound healing, arrhythmia control, and normalization of Virchow's triad (i.e., following major injuries, occlusion/occlusion-like syndromes). As a comparison from a cytoprotective (partial vs. full) standpoint, conventional agents-anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and fibrinolytics-provide only partial protection by targeting isolated components of hemostasis. Beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, prostaglandins, NO modulators, ACE inhibitors, and statins each exert broader cytoprotective effects; however, these actions remain incomplete and context-dependent, typically unidirectional, dose-limited, or are achieved at the expense of opposing pathological risks. Contrarily, for BPC 157, decreased hemorrhage (including both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents), decreased thrombosis, effective wound healing, arrhythmia control, and normalization of Virchow's triad involve preservation of endothelial integrity, normalization of microcirculation, modulation of the NO system, stabilization of hemostatic balance, and recruitment of adaptive collateral pathways. Nevertheless, reliance on preclinical models necessitates further clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.