ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multispectral Fluorescence Imaging for Fast Identification of Cold Stress in Pepper Plants.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigated the feasibility of snapshot multispectral fluorescence imaging for nondestructive identification of cold stress in pepper plants. Fluorescence spectra were obtained by exciting the plant with a 405 nm ultraviolet LED. The plants were grown under three temperature conditions: 17 °C (control), 10 °C (moderate cold stress), and 5 °C (severe cold stress). Raw fluorescence spectra extracted from the demosaiced snapshot images were used as inputs for a deep-learning pipeline consisting of feature extraction, an encoder-decoder GRU, and a multilayer perceptron (MLP), and the results were compared with conventional machine learning classifiers, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and a Gaussian support vector machine (G-SVM). Tukey's HSD test indicated that the proposed deep-learning model achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy and consistently produced superior classification metrics (accuracy of 85.7%, precision of 85.3%, recall of 85.3%, F1-score of 85.2). The trained model was further applied to hyperspectral cubes to generate classification maps; however, moderate misclassification was observed, consistent with the overall prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.