ReviewViruses2026
Reframing West Nile Virus in Latin America: From Enzootic Evidence to Human Risk-Surveillance Gaps and One Health Actions.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus with one of the widest global distributions. Since its discovery in Uganda in 1937, it has become a major zoonotic pathogen, and after its introduction into the United States in 1999, it spread rapidly across the Americas, becoming the leading cause of neuroinvasive arboviral disease. Its expansion illustrates a remarkable ecological adaptability, further intensified by climate change. In Latin America and the Caribbean, WNV circulation has been consistently documented in birds, horses, and mosquitoes; however, confirmed human cases remain disproportionately scarce compared with North America and Europe. Reports include sporadic human cases in Brazil (>100 since 2014), Mexico (~13), Argentina (2006-2007), Puerto Rico (2007), Nicaragua, and Haiti, while animal and vector evidence extends to Guatemala, El Salvador, Belize, Costa Rica, Bolivia, Paraguay, Colombia, Venezuela, Cuba, and Ecuador. This paradox likely reflects structural limitations within regional health systems, including underdiagnosis, restricted diagnostic capacity, and significant surveillance gaps, particularly in contexts where mild febrile syndromes may be misclassified as dengue, Zika, or Chikungunya. The regional risk of emergence is further amplified by climatic variability, ecological change, and intensifying human-wildlife interactions. Experiences from Europe highlight the importance of early detection, transfusion safety, and integrated surveillance within a One Health framework. Strengthening preparedness in Latin America will require investments in diagnostic infrastructure, implementation of standardized seroepidemiological surveys, development of predictive models tailored to local ecological contexts, and robust intersectoral collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.