ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Eccentric Cycling Improves Motor Learning More Than Concentric Cycling.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eccentric Cycling Improves Motor Learning More Than Concentric Cycling.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute aerobic exercise (AAE) performed before motor task practice can enhance skill acquisition and motor learning. To date, research on AAE effects on motor learning has focused exclusively on concentric cycling, leaving the impact of eccentric cycling unexplored. Unlike concentric cycling, eccentric cycling involves muscle lengthening while resisting reverse pedal motion and enables greater force production with lower cardiovascular and metabolic cost. Previous work showed prolonged decreased motor cortex inhibition following eccentric contractions compared to concentric contractions, and eccentric cycling AAE increases cognition-related brain activation. Given the critical contribution of these brain circuits and regions to motor learning, we hypothesized that eccentric cycling AAE performed before motor skill practice would enhance motor learning more than concentric cycling AAE. A total of 60 young healthy individuals were allocated to one of three groups performing 20 min of: (i) eccentric cycling, (ii) concentric cycling, and (iii) seated rest. Both cycling conditions were matched for power output corresponding to 70% peak heart rate elicited during a concentric incremental test. Motor skill acquisition was assessed immediately post-intervention and motor learning at a 48-h retention test. For acquisition and the retention test, the eccentric group outperformed the concentric and rest groups, while the concentric group showed better retention test performance than rest. Thus, we demonstrated that eccentric cycling AAE enhances motor learning more than concentric cycling AAE, while also confirming enhanced motor learning following concentric cycling AAE compared to rest. Eccentric cycling AAE may have important implications for exercise protocols prescribed in sports and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.