ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Estimating population structure using epigenome-wide methylation data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population stratification is one of the source of inflation in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) when not properly accounted for. To address this, we developed methylation population scores (MPSs) to predict genetic principal components (GPCs) using a feature selection approach. We used multi-ethnic DNA methylation data from Illumina EPIC arrays across five cohorts, including MESA (n = 929), CARDIA (n = 1123), JHS (n = 1365), ARIC (n = 2338), and HCHS/SOL (n = 1475), randomly splitting participants into training (85%) and test (15%) sets. Within each cohort, associations between GPCs and CpG sites were estimated using linear regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking and alcohol use, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and cell type proportions, followed by meta-analysis and selection of CpGs with FDR <0.05. We then applied a two-stage weighted least squares Lasso regression to construct MPSs, adjusting for the aforementioned covariates. In the test dataset, MPSs showed strong correlation with GPCs, with R² ranging from 0.27 (MPS7 vs. GPC7) to 0.98 (MPS1 vs. GPC1). Visualization demonstrated that MPSs recapitulated the pattern shown by GPCs in differentiating self-reported White, Black, and Hispanic/Latino groups and outperformed methylation-based principal components constructed using alternative published methods. Additionally, MPSs showed comparable performance to GPCs in reducing inflation in EWAS. Overall, MPSs uses supervised learning with covariate adjustment to capture genetic structure across diverse populations, and provide a reliable estimate of population structure in the data and can complement GPCs when genetic data are absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.