Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902838›Full record

ReviewJournal of fish biology2026

The state of knowledge on four families of Syngnathoidei fishes (Teleostei: Syngnathiformes): Aulostomidae, Centriscidae, Fistulariidae and Solenostomidae.

Syd J Ascione, Elsa Camins, Miguel Correia, Amanda C J Vincent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syd J AscioneProject Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6046-5696
Elsa CaminsProject Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6725-6763
Miguel CorreiaProject Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-1174
Amanda C J VincentProject Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-0251

Funding

Anonymous donorGouvernement Princier - Principauté de MonacoInternational Union for the Conservation of NatureLangar Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge on the ecology and life-history traits of coastal marine species is vital to inform their conservation and management, especially as their coastal habitats come under increasing threats. However, such data have never been collated for four of the five families in the suborder Syngnathoidei-the close relatives of the better-studied Syngnathidae (seahorses, pipefish and seadragons). Here, we present the first review of the state of knowledge on four families in the suborder Syngnathoidei: Aulostomidae (trumpetfish), Centriscidae (bellowsfish, snipefish and razorfish), Fistulariidae (cornetfish) and Solenostomidae (ghost pipefish). We analysed literature from a variety of repositories (n = 761 sources) and extracted information on these fishes' ecology, life-history traits, population parameters, uses and pressures. The families with the widest breadth of available information were Fistulariidae and Aulostomidae, whereas Centriscidae and Solenostomidae exhibited major data gaps across nearly all data fields. Across all families, morphologies, global ranges and maximum lengths are relatively well documented, whereas data concerning survival, reproduction and population metrics are extremely limited. This review uncovered information for all species which, to date, have not been considered in their International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments, and highlighted data gaps which impede conservation planning. Our gap analysis provides an important call-to-action, establishing key research priorities to fill gaps in our understanding, to better inform future conservation assessments and management efforts for these distinctive but understudied fishes.

Indexed as

FishesLife History TraitsSmegmamorphaAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemIUCN Red Listknowledge gapsmarine conservationmarine ecologyreef ecologySyngnathoids

Identifiers

PMID41902838
PMCPMC13397193

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.