ArticleEuropean heart journal2026
Lipoprotein(a) and incident venous thromboembolism in pre- and postmenopausal women, and in men.
Article in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two to Tango: lipoprotein(a) and hormonal status as determinants of venous thromboembolism risk.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, residual risk, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsElevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are an established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but the association between Lp(a) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear. Sex and hormonal status may modify the relationship between Lp(a) and VTE.
methodsThe present study included participants from the UK Biobank with available baseline Lp(a) data. Individuals with a history of VTE or cancer, as well as those using anticoagulants, were excluded. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models were used to assess the association between Lp(a) levels ≥125 nmol/L and incident VTE in premenopausal women, postmenopausal women, and men. Subgroup analyses stratified premenopausal women by oral contraceptive (OCP) use and postmenopausal women by menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use.
resultsAmong 55 302 premenopausal women, 129 045 postmenopausal women, and 189 013 men, the proportions with Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L were 14.0%, 19.0%, and 15.0%, respectively. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 13.6 (12.9-14.4) years, 8186 VTE events occurred (cumulative incidence 2.2%). Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L was associated with incident VTE in premenopausal women [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.66; P = .02] but not in postmenopausal women (aHR 1.03; 95% CI 0.94-1.13; P = .47; Pinteraction = .03) or men (aHR 1.00; 95% CI 0.92-1.08; P = .94). OCP use did not modify the Lp(a)-VTE association among premenopausal women (Pinteraction = .61). However, among postmenopausal MHT users, Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L was associated with higher VTE risk (aHR 1.48; 95% CI 1.03-2.12; P = .03; Pinteraction = .04).
conclusionsElevated Lp(a) was associated with VTE in premenopausal women and in postmenopausal MHT users, suggesting that hormonal context may influence Lp(a)-associated thrombotic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.