ArticleNature communications2026
Underestimated barrier effects of ocean fronts shape global fishery distribution.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine ecosystems exhibit high spatiotemporal heterogeneity, making it crucial to understand the mechanisms sustaining biological hotspots. Ocean fronts shape local biogeochemical processes and have long been recognized as biological hotspots aggregating organisms from phytoplankton to top predators and attracting fisheries (hotspot effects). However, fronts also exhibit pronounced environmental differences between their two sides (barrier effects), and how species and fishery distributions respond to these effects remains poorly understood. By integrating satellite-based front detection with commercial catch records, fishery-independent surveys, and global fishing datasets, we show that fishery distributions across diverse regions and major commercial stocks worldwide respond strongly to barrier effects, exhibiting 15-70% differences in distribution between the frontal warm and cold zones, driven by species-specific local thermal preferences. In contrast, responses to hotspot effects are generally sporadic with only 5-20% differences between frontal and non-frontal zones, and they emerge only when aggregations on one side of fronts offset avoidance on the other. This offset has led earlier studies to conservatively underestimate front-induced fishery variations by 55-75%. Our findings complement the traditional front-induced hotspot paradigm by clarifying the importance of barrier effects and underscore the need to reassess the role of ocean fronts in marine ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.