ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning characterizes depression and suicidal ideation in young adults from eye movements.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From heterogeneity to translation: data‑driven subtyping of autism in a multilevel framework.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective biobehavioral markers for mental health conditions remain elusive, with diagnosis typically relying on self-reports and clinical interviews. We investigate eye tracking as a potential marker of attentional and mood biases associated with symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation from self-reported screening questionnaires. We analyze eye movements from 126 young adults during reading and responding to emotionally loaded sentences. A deep learning framework was designed to account for intra-trial and inter-trial variations in eye movements, achieving an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.766-0.819) for identifying depression/suicidality against healthy controls, and 0.826 (95% CI: 0.798-0.853) for suicidality specifically. The model also exhibited moderate accuracy in differentiating depressed from suicidal individuals (AUC: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.569-0.646). Discriminative patterns were more pronounced during response generation and for stimuli of negative sentiment. These findings suggest that eye tracking can provide objective markers of self-reported symptom severity by measuring the impact of emotional stimuli on oculomotor control.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.