ReviewDrugs2026
Current and Emerging Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depemokimab: toward biannual biologic therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Nasopharyngeal swab transcriptomics identifies divergent molecular signatures in adenoid hypertrophy and allergic rhinitis comorbidity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by persistent symptoms, frequent exacerbations, and corticosteroid dependence despite optimized therapy. Seven monoclonal antibodies are currently approved, targeting immunoglobulin E (IgE; omalizumab), interleukin (IL)-5 or IL-5 receptor α (mepolizumab, reslizumab, depemokimab, benralizumab), IL-4 receptor α (dupilumab), and the epithelial alarmin thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP; tezepelumab). These therapies have demonstrated substantial reductions in exacerbation rates and oral corticosteroid use, along with improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes. Safety profiles are generally favorable across populations. Key predictors of response include blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and phenotype-specific biomarkers. Despite these advances, unmet needs remain. Current biologics only partially address type 2-low, neutrophilic, and mixed granulocytic phenotypes, as well as airway remodeling and persistent exacerbations in type 2-high patients. Emerging strategies aim to overcome these limitations by targeting upstream alarmins (TSLP and IL-33), dual or trispecific cytokine pathways, and IgE-producing B cells. Novel Fc-engineered and dual-receptor anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies enhance the magnitude and durability of IgE suppression. Multi-target constructs, including bispecific and trispecific agents, simultaneously block overlapping type 2 and non-type 2 pathways, which could improve outcomes in heterogeneous and refractory populations. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies suggest that these approaches may provide disease-modifying effects and support biomarker-guided personalized therapy. This review summarizes the current landscape of approved biologics and the rationale for next-generation therapies in severe asthma. It highlights mechanistic insights, clinical efficacy, and future directions for precision-targeted treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.