ArticleBMC medical education2026
Student perceptions and understanding of urology in the United Kingdom - SPARK.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExposure to urology in the United Kingdom (UK) remains limited despite its clinical relevance. Most prior studies on student awareness and attitudes predate the COVID-19 pandemic and include non-final-year students. This study evaluated final-year students’ awareness, preparedness, and perceptions of urology across UK medical schools.
methodsA 17-item survey was disseminated to final-year students in the UK between (June-July 2025) one-month from beginning clinical practice with Medical Schools Council approval. Domains included demographics, understanding of urology, perceptions of pre-clinical and clinical teaching, preparedness for practice, and career attitudes. Descriptive statistics summarized responses.
resultsFifty-four students from 12 medical schools responded, 42 (77.8%) were female. While all had heard of urology, 16.7% were unaware it was a mixed medical-surgical specialty and 3.7% were unfamiliar with urologists’ daily roles, with awareness of roles varying from 66.0% (fertility) to 96.3% (genitourinary surgery). Procedural knowledge varied, with 11.1% completely unaware of operations performed. Nearly half (48.1%) rated pre-clinical teaching inadequate and 31.5% felt clinical teaching insufficient for the UKMLA. Confidence appeared limited, with only 42.6% prepared for history-taking and 20.4% for investigation interpretation. Career interest was low (12.9%), with lack of surgical interest and prior specialty commitment as common deterrents. Students identified workshops, simulation, and greater curricular integration as preferred improvements.
conclusionIn this survey study, final-year UK students demonstrated potential misconceptions about urology’s scope and reported limited preparedness alongside low career interest. Targeted educational initiatives and specialty outreach may enhance exposure, competence, and recruitment into urology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.