Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904569›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026

"Everyone in this together": a qualitative study on mothers as partners in infection prevention in a neonatal unit in Botswana.

Nidhee Jadeja, Samuel T Matula, Ludo Magagani, Margaret Mokomane, Nina Zhu, Susan E Coffin, Andrew P Steenhoff, Margaret Kagiso, Britt Nakstad, Alison Holmes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nidhee Jadeja *Imperial College London, London, England. nidhee.jadeja@gmail.com.
Samuel T Matula *School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Ludo MagaganiSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Margaret MokomaneSchool of Allied Health Professions, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Nina ZhuImperial College London, London, England.
Susan E CoffinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrew P SteenhoffDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margaret KagisoBotswana Ministry of Health, Gaborone, Botswana.
Britt NakstadDepartment of Paediatric & Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Alison Holmes *Imperial College London, London, England.
Jonathan Strysko *Department of Paediatric & Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Funding

MRF_ MRF-145-00040TPG-AVISO Doctoral Training Partnership
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection prevention and control (IPC) is critical in neonatal units to prevent healthcare-associated infections, yet research on IPC has primarily focused on healthcare workers, overlooking the role of family caregivers. In low-resource settings, mothers often take on essential caregiving responsibilities including IPC-related tasks, both a logistic necessity and a cultural norm, but their perspectives and experiences remain underexplored. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore mothers' experiences and perceptions of IPC in a neonatal unit in Gaborone, Botswana. Understanding maternal involvement in IPC is essential for developing effective interventions, particularly in settings where health systems face workforce shortages and resource constraints.

methodsFifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with mothers of infants admitted to the neonatal unit between June and December 2022. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsSix themes were identified. Major themes related to (1) mothers' strong sense of responsibility for IPC and concerns about infection risks, (2) health system constraints (including supply shortages) that limited consistent IPC practice, (3) competing demands within restricted visiting times that required mothers to balance IPC with feeding and bonding, (4) variable communication with health care workers (HCWs) and limited comfort reminding staff about IPC, and (5) peer dynamics between mothers, including mutual reminders as well as tensions arising from shared feeding equipment. A minor theme that emerged was (6) mothers' emotional distress and its perceived impact on remembering and enacting IPC behaviours. Overall, mothers described high motivation to protect their infants but reported that time pressures, insufficient communication with HCWs, and resource limitations constrained IPC adherence, underscoring the need for structured IPC orientation and ongoing support for families in neonatal care.

conclusionMothers in this neonatal unit viewed themselves as key partners in IPC and were highly motivated to protect their infants, but their ability to consistently follow IPC practices was constrained by limited supplies, staffing pressures, restricted time for caregiving and bonding, and variable communication with HCWs. Mothers also expressed concerns about HCW adherence to IPC and described how emotional distress and peer dynamics could shape IPC behaviour. These findings underscore the need for structured IPC education and support for mothers in neonatal units, and the importance of integrating family-centred IPC policies into neonatal care. Future research should evaluate interventions that strengthen caregiver support, improve communication, and address contextual barriers and constraints to sustained IPC practice.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionInfection ControlIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMothersAdultBotswanaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornQualitative ResearchResource-Limited Settingsantimicrobial resistanceInfection prevention and controlmothersneonatal unitneonatesqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41904569
PMCPMC13151290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.