ArticleBMC psychology2026
Association of occupational balance and physical activity on life adjustment strategies among middle-aged Thai adults: a hierarchical modeling.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life adjustment strategies are essential for maintaining mental and emotional well-being and fostering resilience, particularly during middle adulthood. This study aimed to examine the associations between occupational balance, physical activity, and life adjustment strategies among middle-aged adults. A cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted between February and August 2024, enrolling adults aged 40–60 years (n = 1120) across eight representative provinces in Thailand. Data were collected on life adjustment strategies, occupational balance (OB), physical activity (PA), and socio-demographic characteristics. Hierarchical linear regression was employed to analyze the incremental predictive power of demographics, OB, and PA on life adjustment strategies. The final regression model explained 23.4% of the total variance. Socio-demographic analysis revealed that participants aged 55–60 and those who were self-employed reported significantly higher adjustment scores. In Model I, occupation was a primary predictor (β = 0.665, p-value < 0.001). The addition of occupational balance in Model II significantly improved the model (Δ R2= 0.183, p-value < 0.001), with time balance (β = 0.803, p-value < 0.001), resting balance (β = 0.245, p-value < 0.01), and amount balance (β = 0.278, p-value < 0.01) showing strong positive correlations. In Model III, sedentary behavior was significantly and negatively associated with life adjustment strategies (β = − 0.255, p-value < 0.001). These findings underscore the critical role of occupational balance, specifically the management of time and rest in supporting life adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.