ReviewScience progress
Beyond hemoglobin thresholds: A physiology-guided framework for red blood cell transfusion in non-bleeding critically ill patients.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Red blood cell transfusion in non-bleeding critically ill patients is traditionally guided by fixed hemoglobin thresholds. Although restrictive strategies are widely recommended based on population-level randomized trials, hemoglobin concentration alone inadequately reflects the complex physiology of oxygen delivery, tissue perfusion, and cellular oxygen utilization in critical illness. Increasing evidence suggests frequent dissociation between hemoglobin increments and meaningful improvements in tissue oxygenation, particularly in the presence of microcirculatory dysfunction, impaired oxygen extraction, or mitochondrial failure. Moreover, recent trials in patients with limited cardiovascular reserve or acute myocardial ischemia challenge the universal safety of restrictive transfusion thresholds, emphasizing interindividual variability in oxygen supply-demand balance. In this mini-review and expert perspective, we synthesize physiological principles, landmark transfusion trials, and emerging monitoring modalities to propose a practical physiology-guided framework for red blood cell transfusion in non-bleeding critically ill patients. We review global, regional, and cellular markers of oxygen balance, including central venous oxygen saturation, oxygen extraction ratio, arterial-venous oxygen content difference, near-infrared spectroscopy-derived tissue oxygenation, microcirculatory flow indices, and mitochondrial oxygen tension, highlighting complementary roles and inherent limitations. We propose a pragmatic bedside approach in which transfusion is considered only after optimization of non-transfusion determinants of oxygen delivery and guided by integrated physiologic evidence of oxygen debt. This paradigm reframes transfusion as targeted therapy rather than numerical correction of anemia. Future research should combine outcome-driven randomized trials with large-scale data-driven and machine learning approaches to validate physiologic transfusion triggers and identify transfusion-responsive phenotypes in critical illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.