Evidence mapPaperPMID 41904739Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026

Fracture liaison services: successful implementation in Belgium using a regional healthcare quality improvement initiative.

Michaël R Laurent, Pieter Samaey, M Kassim Javaid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michaël R LaurentGeriatrics Department, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. michael.laurent@imelda.be.
Pieter SamaeyGeriatrics Department, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
M Kassim JavaidOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFracture liaison services (FLS) are an evidence-based method to improve the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in post-fracture patients and the quality of secondary fracture prevention. The Capture the Fracture® initiative provides a systematic framework for the development, implementation, continued improvement, and recognition of FLS internationally. This short communication is aimed at describing the progress and successful elements of FLS implementation in Belgium.

methodsDescriptive report of a healthcare quality improvement initiative in accordance with SQUIRE 2.0 reporting standards.

resultsThe first FLS Academy and Network (FAN) meeting in Belgium was held in 2023. Further regional working group activities resulted in rapid expansion from 5 to 20 recognized FLS centres in the country over 2.5 years, almost exclusively situated in the provinces where field support activities were focused.

conclusionA regional approach involving multiple stakeholders in partnership with industry can successfully facilitate implementation of national guidelines and close the care gap post-fracture in osteoporosis, even in the absence of governmental support. We report the successful implementation of fracture liaison services in Belgian hospitals in two provinces using a regional action plan involving a clinical-industry collaboration, despite the absence of government financial incentives. Insights from this healthcare quality improvement initiative could serve as a blueprint to further close the osteoporosis care gap.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesQuality ImprovementBelgiumHumansFracture liaison servicesHealthcare quality improvementOsteoporosisSecondary prevention

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.