Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41905067›Full record

SynthesisPoultry science2026

Meta-analysis of probiotic effects on broiler performance: Bacillus outperforms Lactobacillus with enhanced and longer efficacy in developing regions.

Muhammad Bilal, Mohamed El-Fateh, Hafiz Muhammad Arfan, Xin Zhao

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad BilalDepartment of Animal Science, Macdonald-Stewart Building, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada; H9X 3V9.
Mohamed El-FatehDepartment of Animal Science, Macdonald-Stewart Building, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada; H9X 3V9.
Hafiz Muhammad ArfanDepartment of Animal Science, Macdonald-Stewart Building, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada; H9X 3V9.
Xin ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, Macdonald-Stewart Building, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada; H9X 3V9. Electronic address: Xin.Zhao@McGill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are increasingly investigated as sustainable alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production, with Bacillus and Lactobacillus being the most extensively studied genera. However, performance responses remain inconsistent across studies, probiotic genera, and production settings. This meta-analysis quantified the overall effects of probiotics on broiler growth performance, with particular emphasis on genus-specific responses and study-level moderators of feed conversion ratio (FCR). Following PRISMA guidelines, 53 studies comprising 106 independent trials were included. Random-effects models were used to estimate mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using Q, τ², and I² statistics. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses evaluated potential moderators, including probiotic genus, dose, trial duration, breed, feed type, probiotic configuration, and regional economic status. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and adjusted using the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method. Overall, probiotic supplementation significantly improved body weight (66.61 g, P < 0.001), feed intake (29.80 g, P = 0.002), and FCR (0.058, P < 0.001). After adjustment estimates increased for body weight (78.34 g), feed intake (61.42 g), and FCR (0.107). Probiotic genus, trial duration, and regional economic classification were identified as significant moderators of FCR (P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that Bacillus-based probiotics were associated with more consistent improvements in FCR across production stages (days 21, 35, and 42), whereas Lactobacillus-based effects showed a transient effect limited to day 21. Probiotic-associated improvements in FCR were more pronounced in studies conducted in developing regions. Overall, the findings support that probiotics enhance broiler performance, with Bacillus providing superior and sustained efficacy, supporting its strategic use as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters.

Indexed as

BacillusChickensLactobacillusProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFeed efficiencyGrowth promotionPoultry nutritionSustainable production

Identifiers

PMID41905067
PMCPMC13049298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.