ArticlePlant methods2026
Go Big or go home: a new gene ontology subset that improves plant gene function prediction.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex-specific ethylene responses drive floral sexual plasticity in Cannabis sativa.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe availability of gene function prediction datasets helps researchers to consider possible functions for uncharacterized genes for hypothesis generation, candidate gene prioritization, and many other applications. Many such datasets are based on the Gene Ontology (GO) function graph. For plants this can be problematic because the most specific GO terms available are often derived from the biology of non-plant taxa (e.g., functions specific to nerve function would not seem likely to map to plant biological processes given that plants lack nerves). To balance the need for functional specificity while limiting to functions relevant to plant biology, researchers often limit to the GO Slim plant subset, but, by design, that subset consists of very general terms and limits real utility for, e.g., specific hypothesis generation. Worse yet, sometimes researchers choose to simply throw out terms if they are not relevant to plant biology (rather than traversing the GO graph to select the most specific term in that hierarchy that is compatible with plant biology).
resultsWe created GO Big, a Gene Ontology subset type, to improve the biological relevance of gene function predictions for taxon-specific biology applications. GO Big plant subsets retain maximal functional specificity for hypothesis generation while limiting to terms applicable to the biology of plants. In brief, we used a curatorial approach to generate two GO Big subsets, a general subset derived from terms with experimentally validated functions across Viridiplantae species, and a species-specific subset for maize (Zea mays ssp. mays).
conclusionAnnotating genes with assignments that better reflect the biology of a taxon can pave the way for more biologically accurate and testable hypotheses for genes of interest. The subsets produced here can help plant biologists limit genome-wide gene function prediction sets to functions possible for plant genes, and the process to generate GO Big subsets is described in detail to enable others to create GO Big subsets for additional taxon sets, including ones for protists, fungi, and other phylogenetic categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.