ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Validity and reliability of the Pica, ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q) in Turkish adolescents.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough global awareness of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is increasing, non-Western countries remain underrepresented in the research literature. The Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), one of the most extensively validated instruments with strong psychometric properties, is widely used to assess ARFID in both clinical and non-clinical pediatric populations. However, to date, no study has evaluated its reliability and validity among adolescents in Turkey. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PARDI-AR-Q in an adolescent sample.
methodThe sample comprised 483 adolescents aged 12-18 years, Participants completed a sociodemographic and clinical data form, the PARDI-AR-Q, the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS), the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS), the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS), and the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-Child version (RCADS-CV) on an online platform.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 15.1 years (SD = 1.9). Of these participants, 170 (35.2%) were male and 313 (64.8%) were female. The PARDI-AR-Q showed good to excellent internal consistency, with a well-fitting four-factor structure, including severity of impact (α = 0.955), sensory-based avoidance (α = 0.96), concern about aversive consequences (α = 0.965), and lack of interest (α = 0.848). Test-retest analyses further supported the reliability of the scale. Each PARDI-AR-Q subscale correlated most highly with its conceptually matched NIAS subscale, whereas non-target subscales demonstrated minimal or no associations, supporting both its convergent and discriminant validity. In addition, the PARDI-AR-Q subscales were primarily unrelated to eating attitudes related to weight and shape (EDE-QS), which also provides evidence for its discriminant validity.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that the Turkish version of the PARDI-AR-Q is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing ARFID symptoms in community samples of Turkish adolescents. The Turkish version of the PARDI-AR-Q may contribute to the identification of ARFID-related symptom patterns in adolescents; however, its clinical utility for early detection should be further established through studies conducted in clinical samples using diagnostic interviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.