ReviewANZ journal of surgery
Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation: A Narrative Review.
Review in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis and recurrent acute pancreatitis are progressive disorders associated with severe pain, functional limitation and major impairment in health-related quality of life. For selected patients with disease refractory to medical, endoscopic or limited surgical therapy, total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) offers definitive pain control whilst preserving endogenous insulin production. Whilst metabolic outcomes such as insulin independence have traditionally guided evaluation of this procedure, patient-reported outcomes provide a broader assessment of its clinical impact and are increasingly relevant to surgical decision-making. This narrative review synthesises the available evidence on health-related quality of life, psychological well-being and occupational outcomes following TPIAT in adult patients. Across published cohorts, TPIAT is consistently associated with clinically meaningful improvements in global quality of life, particularly in pain, physical functioning and emotional well-being, with benefits observed even amongst patients who remain insulin dependent. Psychological health generally improves following surgery, although detailed characterisation is limited by infrequent use of validated psychiatric instruments. In contrast, occupational recovery is more variable, often constrained by long-standing pre-operative disability, prolonged opioid exposure and socioeconomic factors rather than surgical outcomes alone. Interpretation of existing data is challenged by small sample sizes, heterogeneous outcome measures and limited long-term follow-up. Overall, current evidence supports TPIAT as a procedure that confers substantial patient-centred benefits for appropriately selected adults with refractory pancreatitis. These findings highlight the importance of timely referral, comprehensive pre-operative assessment, and structured multi-disciplinary post-operative support, and underscore the need for standardised, prospective evaluation of patient-reported outcomes to better inform surgical counselling and optimise long-term recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.