ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Decision-Making Dilemmas Among Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the decision-making dilemmas experienced by elderly patients with advanced prostate cancer when considering Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Using purposive sampling, 20 elderly prostate cancer patients who had received Results: Three overarching themes and nine subthemes were identified, reflecting multi-layered decision-making conflicts. (1) Decision-making triggers dilemma described information cognitive deficits, family value conflicts, and weak support systems that constrained patients' understanding and autonomy. (2) Decision-conflicting perceptual dilemma captured uncertainty regarding treatment efficacy and emotional distress caused by disease progression and prior treatment experiences. (3) Coping-adaptive behavioral dilemma illustrated financial constraints, dependent decision tendencies, and varied coping strategies, alongside expressed needs for accessible and technology-supported tools. These findings reveal the complex interplay of cognitive, emotional, familial, and systemic factors influencing treatment decisions. Conclusion: Effective resource support can help elderly prostate cancer patients cope with various dilemmas during the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.