ArticleJAMIA open2026
Converting unstructured cardiac catheterization and echocardiography reports into structured data using transformer-based language models.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Survey on Perspectives Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Italian Interventional Cardiologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization reports capture important clinical assessment information of cardiac function and disease severity. This study explores using open-source transformer-based language models (LMs) that are run locally within an institutional environment as a privacy-preserving alternative to external API-based large LM to systematically extract clinical data from unstructured echocardiography and cardiac catheterization reports, aiming to improve data accessibility for research and patient care. Materials and Methods: Two transformer-based LMs, BioclinicalBERT and BART-Large-CNN, were fine-tuned in a secure local environment using a question-answering approach. The dataset included 3286 echocardiography and 1884 cardiac catheterization reports from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's electronic health records, annotated for 25 and 47 predefined categories, respectively. Three hundred reports from each type were randomly selected and used for validation, with the remainder for training. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score at 2 probability thresholds. The effect of training set size on model performance was also evaluated. Results: Both models achieved consistent and high accuracy, precision, and recall (all >90%) across the 5 seed runs for both report types. For echocardiography, BioclinicalBERT reached mean accuracy of 95.7%, precision of 97.6%, recall of 97.4%, and F1-score of 0.98 at the probability threshold of 0.1; BART-Large-CNN had similar results. For cardiac catheterization, BART-Large-CNN slightly outperformed BioclinicalBERT with mean accuracy 94.9% vs 94.3%; precision 96.7% vs 96.3%; recall 96.1% vs 95.7%, and F1-score 0.96 vs 0.96 at the probability threshold of 0.1. Most individual categories showed strong performance, though a few (eg, prosthetic mitral valve, right atrial pressure) had lower scores. Performance improved with more training data, but plateauing around 1000 reports. Discussion and conclusion: Fine-tuned transformer-based LMs can effectively extract structured data from unstructured cardiac reports, supporting automated information extraction to enhance research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.