SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Choroidal Parameters in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) can lead to irreversible visual impairment. Traditional treatment methods are limited by their efficacy and the risk of complications. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option. Objective: This study systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of SML for treating cCSC, providing evidence-based clinical recommendations. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published up to January 10, 2025, evaluating SML for cCSC. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and case series. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using RoB 2, NOS, and JBI tools, respectively. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 18.0 to pool the effects on visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal morphology (CMT, CT, CRT). Subgroup analyses were performed based on laser wavelengths (527, 532, 577, and 810 nm). Results: A total of 1,412 articles were identified, and 21 studies were included, with a total sample size of 939 eyes. Meta-analysis demonstrated that SML significantly improved the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of cCSC patients, with a pooled effect size of [SMD = -0.74, 95% CI (-1.14, -0.33), Conclusion: SML significantly improves visual function and retinal morphology in cCSC patients, demonstrating consistent efficacy across different wavelengths and providing a safe, effective treatment option for cCSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.