ArticleDigital health
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy identification using enface optical coherence tomography and multi-head attention deep learning algorithm.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DFU-GCNet: a global context-enhanced inception network for robust and interpretable diabetic foot ulcer classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common chronic complication of diabetes, but current diagnostic methods are limited by invasiveness, poor sensitivity, or subjectivity. This study aims to develop a non-invasive, reliable diagnostic tool using multimodal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and a deep learning (DL) algorithm with multi-head attention for early DPN detection. Methods: A multi-head attention-based DL model was constructed, with ResNet-18 as the feature extractor to fuse and classify enface OCT images from different retinal layers. A total of 3264 OCT images from 544 eyes of 435 diabetic patients were enrolled. The model was evaluated via fivefold cross-validation on the training dataset (Dataset A, n = 267) and further validated on a temporal validation dataset (Dataset B, n = 168). Single-layer contrast experiments were conducted to identify the most predictive retinal layer, and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was used for model visualization. Results: The proposed model achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.719 in fivefold cross-validation and an AUC of 0.721 in the temporal validation dataset. Among all retinal layers, the avascular layer provided the highest predictive value for DPN (average AUC = 0.707), with significant differences in performance compared to other layers ( Conclusion: The multi-head attention-based DL model effectively identifies DPN using non-invasive OCT images, with the avascular layer providing critical information. This approach provides a promising clinically feasible early screening strategy, and photoreceptor defects may serve as a potential DPN biomarker, requiring further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.