ArticleDigital health
Generative AI and large language model evaluation of kidney donation websites: Benchmarking health literacy, sentiment, and digital engagement to optimize donor recruitment.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation offers substantial clinical and economic benefits for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet organ shortages persist. Enhancing public awareness and health literacy regarding kidney donation is essential for effective donor recruitment. While online patient education materials are primary drivers of public perception, their readability, digital engagement, and accessibility remain underexplored barriers. Methods: We analyzed the most prominent kidney donation websites identified through U.S.-based Google searches, including 11 primary organizations and 16 affiliated subdomains, for a total of 27 websites. Readability was benchmarked using Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, and Gunning Fog indices. To assess qualitative metrics, we deployed a generative AI framework utilizing a Large Language Model (Claude) to conduct automated sentiment analysis and tone evaluation, validated by human review. We systematically mapped digital engagement features, including multimedia, interactive tools, and multilingual support, to determine content comprehensiveness. Results: Websites consistently provided accurate information with a generally positive or neutral tone. Average readability exceeded recommended levels, with a combined mean grade of 12.3; 34% of websites were written at a college-level reading standard. Consensus across content was high. Multimedia elements were widely used, but engagement features were limited; only 30% of sites included extensive testimonials, and interactive tools were absent. AI-based analysis enabled standardized and reproducible evaluation, highlighting opportunities to improve accessibility, tone, and inclusivity. Conclusion: Current U.S. kidney donation digital resources present a barrier to health equity due to excessive reading complexity and static engagement models. AI provides a scalable, reproducible framework to audit and optimize patient education materials. Future initiatives must leverage AI-guided content optimization to bridge the literacy gap, potentially increasing donor registration and access to transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.