SynthesisFrontiers in neurorobotics2026
The evolution of trends and technology in wearable sensors used to detect falls in people with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a significant threat to human health. Numerous research demonstrated that patients with NDs might present with decreased balance, which is responsible for an increased risk of falling. As an emerging technology, wearable devices can detect falls and prevent privacy breaches. Objective: To access the evolution of trends and technology in wearable devices to detect falls among patients with NDs. Methods: We screened PubMed and Web of Science (February 2023) to summarize the pathway of fall detection with any body-worn sensor. Included articles were required to be full-text and published in English. Documents were excluded if they; (1) only used wearable devices for fall cueing, (2) did not offer sufficient information for data extraction, (3) did not use patients with NDs, (4) only used non-wearable sensors or devices. Results: The review identified 89 articles at the end of the procedure for data extraction. A wide variety existed in participant sample size (1-131), sensor types, placement and algorithms. 97.75% of papers ( Conclusion: These results show that an increasing number of researchers examine the validation performance of their systems in non-real-time. The ankle was the preferred location among researchers, and there is a clear preference to use multiple types of sensors and machine learning algorithms to improve accuracy and immediacy. Future work should focus on other NDs instead of limiting to Parkinson's disease and consider an adequately studied population. A consensus on walking tasks and accuracy measurements is urgently needed. Performing studies in a simulated free-living environment for a specified time frame is advisable, with continuous real-time monitoring and assessment. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023405952).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.