Effectiveness of telepsychiatry in college students: A cross sectional evaluation.

Murali M R, Mallikarjun Samala, Rahul Tiwari, Heena Dixit Tiwari, Prashant M C, Tohid Ali, Afroz Kalmee Syed

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Murali M RDepartment of Psychiatry, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Mallikarjun SamalaPiedmont Rockdale Hospital & Family, First Primary Clinic, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Rahul TiwariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Heena Dixit TiwariProgramme Officer, Blood Cell, Commissionerate of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad, India.

Prashant M CPiedmont Rockdale Hospital & Family, First Primary Clinic, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Tohid AliDepartment of Oral Medicine and radiology, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Afroz Kalmee SyedDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Writing and Publications, Tenali andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telepsychiatry has rapidly expanded as a response to the growing mental health needs of college students. This cross-sectional evaluation surveyed 376 students across three universities regarding usage, satisfaction and effectiveness of telepsychiatry. Results showed significant reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms, high satisfaction and reduced missed appointments, particularly with video-based consultations. Privacy, connectivity and rapport were key barriers. Thus, we show that telepsychiatry is an effective and acceptable alternative to in-person care, though implementation should address engagement and privacy concerns.

Indexed as

college studentseffectivenessengagementsatisfactionTelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID41907892

DOI10.6026/973206300214304

PMCPMC13018458

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.