Evidence mapPaperPMID 41908018Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Effect of opioid-free versus opioid-based anaesthesia among surgical patients in public health care centers: A community medicine perspective.

Anushree Shukla, Naikey Minarey, Mona Bhalavi, Purvi Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anushree ShuklaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Apollo Hospitals, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Naikey MinareyDepartment of Pediatrics, Sunderlal Patwa Government Medical College, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mona BhalaviDepartment of Anesthesiology, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Purvi JainDepartment of Anaesthesiology, CARE CHL, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxieties about the opioid epidemic should motivate research into more secure and economical methods of managing pain during surgery. Hence, a total of 204 surgical patients receiving either opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) or opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) at public healthcare institutions were compared. Dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocane were used in OFA to lessen the severity of postoperative pain, side effects and recovery time. The OFA group also had higher rates of patient satisfaction and overall affordability. Thus, OFA is a more practical and superior substitute for community surgical services.

Indexed as

community healthcarecost-effectivenessmultimodal analgesiaOpioid-free anaesthesiapostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID41908018
PMCPMC13018350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.