ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Loneliness in adolescents and youth with bipolar disorder: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations Between Parenting Stress, Family Support, Emotion Regulation, and Parental Burnout in Parents of Adolescents with Mood Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Study.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) commonly emerges in adolescence, a period marked by heightened mood lability and shifting social roles that may amplify interpersonal stressors and functional risk. Loneliness and social isolation are transdiagnostic, developmentally salient constructs associated with psychiatric morbidity and physiological dysregulation, yet their relevance to youth BD has not been comprehensively summarized. This review synthesizes evidence on loneliness and social isolation in adolescents and youth with BD. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to July 2025 using terms related to BD, loneliness/social isolation, and adolescents/youth. Peer-reviewed studies were eligible (no language/date restrictions) if they included participants with a formal diagnosis of BD and measured loneliness and/or social isolation. Of 514 records screened, six studies met inclusion criteria. Methods followed the PCC framework, JBI Reviewer's Manual, and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Six studies (N = 522) included adolescents and young adults with BD. Across heterogeneous designs, loneliness and/or social isolation were repeatedly associated with BD-relevant outcomes, including diagnostic group differences, altered neural responses to social exclusion, and temporal proximity to mood episodes. Social isolation was generally related to poorer psychosocial functioning. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that loneliness and social isolation are meaningfully related to clinical and functional correlates in youth BD and may help distinguish BD from comparison groups, although causal and temporal inferences remain limited. Longitudinal and mechanistic studies are needed to clarify directionality and pathways (e.g., mood, cognition, stress biology). Clinically, routine assessment and interventions targeting loneliness/social isolation may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.