ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Systematic review of undeclared prohibited substances and pharmacological adulterants in dietary supplements: prevalence, detection, and risks in sport.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The proliferation of dietary supplement use among athletes has heightened concerns over inadvertent doping due to contamination with substances prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and other undeclared pharmacological adulterants. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the prevalence, detection, and risks associated with sport supplement contamination. The review framework encompassed both explicitly prohibited doping agents and potent metabolic adulterants that pose significant regulatory and health risks. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, 12,031 records were initially identified across Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus, of which 44 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Findings indicate that approximately 9-15% of commercially available supplements tested in empirical studies were contaminated with prohibited substances and unapproved pharmacological agents, predominantly stimulants and anabolic agents. Contamination was most frequently identified in pre-workout, weight-loss, and muscle-building products. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) emerged as the most widely used analytical method, followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and hybrid spectroscopic techniques, enabling high-sensitivity detection across diverse substance classes, including structural analogs and emerging metabolic markers.The findings highlight a critical gap between product labeling and actual chemical composition, posing a persistent threat to athlete integrity and public health. Discussion: This review stresses the need for more stringent international manufacturing standards, expanded analytical screening protocols that account for emerging structural analogs, and enhanced athlete education to mitigate the risk of unintentional doping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.