ArticleProstate international2026
Irreversible electroporation for localized prostate cancer: risk-stratified oncologic outcomes and functional preservation.
Article in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Irreversible electroporation in focal therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future directions.Prostate international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among men globally. Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a non-thermal ablation modality, selectively induces tumor cell apoptosis via high-voltage electrical pulses while sparing critical periprostatic structures. 10. (low-risk: 21, intermediate-risk: 21, and high-risk: 7). Serial assessments of PSA, MRI, urinary function (IPSS), and sexual outcomes (IIEF-5) were conducted at intervals of 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Median PSA nadir reached 1.69 ng/mL, with a cumulative clinically significant recurrence rate of 14.28% at a follow-up of up to months. PSA monitoring (>4 ng/ml) demonstrated a true positive rate of 57.1% (4/7 cases) for detecting clinically significant recurrence. Notably, sensitivity for PSA>10 ng/mL was limited to 28.6% (2/7 cases). Risk-stratified analysis revealed clinically significant recurrence rates of 4.8%, 19.0%, and 28.6% for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk cohorts, respectively. Postoperative complications included urinary incontinence (6.1%) and sexual dysfunction (4.1%), with no metastatic progression observed. These findings position IRE as a promising therapeutic strategy for localized PCa, offering favorable functional preservation and encouraging oncological control, particularly in low-to intermediate-risk patients. However, the elevated clinically significant recurrence rates observed in intermediate-high risk cohorts underscore two critical imperatives: first, the exploration of combined therapeutic regimens to mitigate recurrence risk, and second, establishing risk-stratified PSA thresholds and integrating advanced imaging biomarkers to enable dynamic postoperative surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.