ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
A Clinical Prediction Model for Invasive Pulmonary Fungal Disease in Dialysis Patients: Development, Validation, and Pharmacist-Led Application.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are particularly vulnerable to fungal infections attributable to immunocompromised status, frequent therapeutic interventions, and environmental exposure. Notably, invasive pulmonary fungal infection (IPFI) carries particularly high morbidity and mortality rates. The non-specific clinical manifestations coupled with inconclusive microbiological findings frequently result in diagnostic delays. Compounded by the narrow therapeutic window, these factors pose significant clinical challenges and adversely affect patient outcomes. Typical misdiagnosis rates for IPFI in MHD patients exceed 50%, with median diagnostic delays of 10-14 days, contributing to mortality rates up to 40% from delayed antifungal therapy. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for identifying IPFI in MHD patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included MHD patients with pneumonia admitted between January 2022 and December 2023 for the modeling cohort (IPFI group, n = 51; non-IPFI group, n = 951). An external validation cohort consisted of patients admitted from January to December 2024 (IPFI group, n = 22; non-IPFI group, n = 463). Predictors were screened from 22 clinical variables using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and a prediction model was constructed using logistic regression. Predictors were standardized (z-score normalization) before LASSO to ensure comparability. Results: A final four-variable model was developed, including highest body temperature, hypothyroidism, pancytopenia, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated disease. The model demonstrated strong discrimination, good calibration, and strong performance in the calibration plot. The model showed good internal validity (optimism-corrected AUC = 0.864; calibration slope = 0.97) and maintained robust performance in external validation (AUC = 0.877, 95% CI: 0.800-0.948; calibration slope = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.828-1.511). In the LASSO path, pancytopenia showed the highest importance (standard Conclusion: This prediction model effectively identifies MHD patients with pneumonia at high risk of developing IPFI, demonstrating robust predictive performance. This tool can facilitate early risk stratification by clinical pharmacists in ward decision-support and stewardship consultations, optimizing the prophylactic and targeted use of antifungal agents and promoting rational drug therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.