ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Beyond dose: an occupational health perspective on architecture as an overlooked component of dental radiology exposure in industrial settings.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental X-ray imaging is widely used in daily dental practice and is usually considered safe because radiation doses are low. This belief mainly comes from studies carried out in hospitals and standard dental clinics, where walls and rooms are built with proper radiation shielding. However, dental radiology is not always performed in such environments. In many industrial and corporate workplaces, dental clinics are located inside office buildings that use thin, lightweight, or prefabricated walls. In these settings, wall shielding might be overlooked, absent or not regularly checked. During dental imaging, especially when cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used, scattered radiation may pass outside the dental room, reaching nearby offices or to surrounding working areas. Not only are dental staff exposed, but also other workers who are not considered radiation workers and are not routinely monitored. From this point of view, it is an occupational health perspective based on professional past experiences and published literature. It discusses how building design, wall materials, indoor scatter radiation, and environmental conditions may be overlooked factors in occupational exposure from dental radiology in industrial settings. Special attention is given to the thyroid gland because of its known sensitivity to radiation. No exposure measurements or case investigations are presented, and no causal conclusions are made. The aim of this perspective is to raise awareness and encourage further workplace audits and research on architectural shielding and radiation protection in non-hospital dental clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.