ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Development and external validation of a machine learning model based on preoperative nutritional status for predicting acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Preoperative nutritional status may influence AKI risk, but its predictive value remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 811 CABG patients from two centers. Nutritional status was assessed using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines evaluated associations with AKI. The most predictive index, combined with key clinical variables selected via LASSO and Boruta, was used to build six machine-learning models. Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP, and a web-based calculator was deployed. Results: All three indices were independently associated with AKI, with PNI performing best (AUC = 0.617). The GBM model showed highest predictive performance with AUCs of 1.000, 0.978, and 0.905 in training, internal, and external validation sets, respectively. SHAP identified PNI, LVEF, and CPB as top contributors. Conclusion: Preoperative nutritional status, particularly PNI, is an independent predictor of AKI. An interpretable GBM model incorporating nutritional and clinical variables enables accurate individualized risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.