ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Identification and experimental validation of biomarkers associated with integrated stress response in sepsis.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strategies that specifically target the integrated stress response (ISR) as a therapeutic approach in sepsis remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to identify and validate ISR-related biomarkers in sepsis. Methods: This study used 529 ISR-related genes (ISRRGs) alongside sepsis datasets. First, differentially expressed gene between sepsis and normal samples, key module genes associated with sepsis, and ISRRGs were intersected to identify candidate genes. Next, biomarkers were selected through three machine learning methods. Subsequently, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, regulatory network analysis, and drug prediction were conducted. Finally, the biomarkers were experimentally validated using RT-qPCR. Results: Four biomarkers of sepsis (DYRK2, BCL2, NUP93, and NFATC2) were identified; collectively, these biomarkers are associated with the enrichment of translation initiation in sepsis. A total of 783 significantly upregulated pathways and 1203 significantly downregulated pathways were identified. These biomarkers were co-regulated by multiple microRNAs and transcription factors. Importantly, 726 drugs were predicted to interact with these biomarkers. Additionally, RT-qPCR results demonstrated that the expression levels of DYRK2, BCL2, NUP93, and NFATC2 differed significantly between sepsis and normal samples. Conclusion: DYRK2, BCL2, NUP93, and NFATC2 were identified as biomarkers of sepsis, offering new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for its treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.