Evidence mapPaperPMID 41909247Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2026

Comprehensive Model for Mental health Access and service use (CoMMA): A process model for technology-enhanced mental healthcare.

N A J De Witte, P Best, J Torous, M Mulvenna, E Van Assche, K Mathiasen, A M Kleiboer, P Carlbring, T Van Daele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

N A J De WittePsychology & Technology, Centre of Expertise Care and Well-being, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
P BestTIME Centre for Technological Innovation, Mental Health and Education, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
J TorousDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, United States.
M MulvennaSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
E Van AsschePsychology & Technology, Centre of Expertise Care and Well-being, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
K MathiasenDept. of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark.
A M KleiboerDepartment of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P CarlbringDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
T Van DaelePsychology & Technology, Centre of Expertise Care and Well-being, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent decades, mental healthcare reforms have been proposed to facilitate deinstitutionalization, integration into primary care, task-sharing to non-specialist providers and, more recently, digital interventions. All are aimed at improving the accessibility, acceptability and effectiveness of care. However, many healthcare systems still suffer from complexity, rigidity and inequity in access. New and more integrated models of service delivery are needed to fully harness the potential of evidence-based approaches in mental healthcare, including digital or community-based interventions. The current contribution provides an overview of recent developments - in the organization of care, allocation of healthcare services, and the digital transformation of care - and presents the Comprehensive Model for Mental health Access and service use (CoMMA). The process model includes both informal support (e.g., self-help and community care) as well as formal services (e.g., diagnostics and interventions delivered by healthcare professionals). In line with the increasing digital transformation of care, CoMMA also addressed how technology can play a role in the different model components. The purpose of the model is to provide guidance to healthcare systems, professionals and trainees in shaping the provision of evidence-based psychological services and implementing interventions. It hereby aims to complement ongoing societal, regulatory, and economic changes in the healthcare field by providing a conceptual and substantive narrative. The model shows how mental health services can be organized based on current scientific frameworks, policy perspectives, and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Blended careDigital mental healthHealthcare systemsMental healthSelf-helpTreatment

Identifiers

PMID41909247
PMCPMC13018879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.